Steve always did see the best in people, but it's not always true. He's motivated more from a selfish standpoint; he doesn't want to be the one to hurt anyone, more than he doesn't want anyone to get hurt. It's a subtle difference, but it's an important one. Either way, he's surprised that Steve has to ask why he thinks he's dangerous.
Does this mean nobody has told Steve yet what he's done?
It raises his trust in Tony and Natasha somewhat, because they must both have had the opportunity to tell Steve what he did and neither have. But he's not going to hide it. It's the best piece of evidence he has that he's not to be trusted still, that he's dangerous.
"I killed two people here only three weeks ago."
Does he have to give further explanation? Or isn't that enough to prove his point?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2016-08-18 12:22 pm (UTC)Does this mean nobody has told Steve yet what he's done?
It raises his trust in Tony and Natasha somewhat, because they must both have had the opportunity to tell Steve what he did and neither have. But he's not going to hide it. It's the best piece of evidence he has that he's not to be trusted still, that he's dangerous.
"I killed two people here only three weeks ago."
Does he have to give further explanation? Or isn't that enough to prove his point?